ABSTRACT
The C-terminal domain (CTD) of porcine deltacoronavirus S1 subunit is the main region which induces the neutralizing antibody. S1-CTD was expressed by HEK-293T eukaryotic expression system and purified, and porcine ileal epithelium cells membrane proteins were extracted to investigate porcine host proteins that interact with it. Thirty-two suspected interacting host proteins were obtained by co-inmunprecipitation (Co-IP) and mass spectrometry. Eukaryotic expression plasmid of KIF1 binding protein (KIFBP) was constructed, and the interaction between KIFBP and S1-CTD was identified by Co-IP and laser confocal microscopy. All results proved that KIFBP interacted with S1-CTD and co-located in cytoplasm. Further research indicated that overexpression of KIFBP could effectively reduce the viral mRNA level and the viral titer in which the mRNA level decreased by about 70%, and the viral titer decreased by 101.6TCID50. In conclusion, a host protein KIFBP interacting with PDCoV S1-CTD was screened and identified in this study which provides a theoretical basis for understanding the pathogenesis of PDCoV.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 cases with suspected returned-positive SRAS-CoV-2 tests following consecutive negative tests have been reported, but evidence-based explanations for this phenomenon is still lacking. We aimed to describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics of returned-positive COVID-19 patients during treatment in comparison with other patients.Methods: From January 20 to April 10, 2020, all COVID-19 inpatient with at least three RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 tests in Renmin Hospital in Wuhan, China were enrolled. Patients with 2 consecutively negative RT-PCR results followed by a positive result were classified as returned-positive patients, and their characteristics and repeatedly measured laboratory results were compared with the rest of the patients. Linear mixed effects models were performed.Results: A total of 789 COVID-19 patients were included and 22.8% patients returned positive in RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test. No significant differences were found for general characteristics between the returned-positive and the control groups. The trends of inflammatory and immune factors including the third component of complement (C3), C-reactive protein, procalcitonin (PCT), IL-4, IL-6, the counts of lymphocyte, CD3+, CD8+, white blood cell and immunoglobulin levels during hospitalization were significantly different between the two groups. During the returned-positive period, C3, PCT, serum IgM, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG were significantly higher in the returned-positive patients at certain time points.Conclusions: Returned-positive COVID-19 patients appeared to be more sever at admission, and had periodically higher levels in C3, PCT, serum IgM and two specific antibodies during hospitalization. This suggests that positive return of SARS-COV-2 could not be completely explained by false-negative testing and longer observation of these patients is warranted.